Peter Forsberg Is NOT Brett Favre

Posted by on February 19th, 2011


Over the past few weeks, we’ve seen Peter Forsberg announce his intents to try to play in the NHL again, sign a contract, and then subsequently retire from playing hockey.

He’s made several attempts at a comeback over the last several years, but he was never able to overcome his injuries and had to put playing again on hold. But now he’s decided to finally hang the skates up for good.

Because of his comeback attempts, some people have compared Forsberg to Brett Favre and his seemingly neverending saga. The Forsberg/Favre comparisons, however, could not be further from reality. Yes, both players struggled to make decisions whether or not they wanted to continue playing, but otherwise, there’s not much to complain about how Forsberg handled himself.

For Forsberg, it was never a matter of whether or not he wanted to play, it was a matter of whether or not he could play. I don’t think there was ever a lull in his desire to continue playing. Forsberg suffered from foot injuries that severely hampered his ability to play at what he considered a suitable level. He underwent surgery after surgery to fix the problem, part of which being that the shape of his foot was changed after one of his earlier surgeries, causing him additional problems.


Peter Forsberg is a very proud player, and even though a Forsberg at 80% ability is better than most NHL players, he wouldn’t play unless he was at 100%. He doesn’t care about records or personal fame or the paychecks, he wants to win. That’s it. If he were in it for the money, he would have gladly played at a lesser level just to collect his check. Teams would have lined up at his doorstep offering him much more than the pro-rated $1 million contract he signed with the Avalanche this season. But he’s not going to play unless he feels he can truly help a team. He didn’t feel he could anymore, so he decided to retire.

And that’s the shame about the whole situation: one of the game’s better player’s career was cut short because of a seemingly small problem that was completely out of his control. He was the model professional on and off the ice. He could take control of a game like only a few in the game have ever done, in a way that even the best players of today are not able to yet to do. He had a very underrated physical game and his feel and sight of the game was so great that certain players with similar skills are described to have “Forsberg vision.”

As for the media frenzy Forsberg’s comeback attempts cause, why blame him? He’s never tried to bring the attention to himself – but when a player of his calibre makes an important announcement, the media storm follows. As long as the player doesn’t try to milk it, how it is his fault?

For the record, I’m not trying to say that Brett Favre did all of things that Forsberg didn’t. That said, however, Favre’s saga got old very quickly for many, many people and I can’t personally say that his intentions were quite as pure as Forsberg’s. Oh yeah, and Forsberg never sent any questionable texts to anyone…

Stephen Bochanski

If you found this post interesting please consider either subscribing via RSS, becoming a fan on Facebook or Google+, or following us on Twitter.

  • Anonymous

    Forsberg and favre in the same sentence. Blasphemy. favre destroyed teams w/ his umlimited comebacks, plus I think Peter the Great has never been guilty of texting body parts to people. Favre is a dog.
    Forsberg was a highly skilled player who punished the opposition w/ his strength. many a defenseman was knocked on his can trying to take the puck off Forsberg.
    A superb skater/passer and one of the toughest competitors ever in any sport. been a fan of his since "the goal" I have the postage stamp that commemorates it thanks to a thoughtful son of mine. never took a shift off. Remember former Bruins GM Mike O'Connell never really sought to sign forsberg, because " he was happy with alex Zhamnov".
    Agree , Forsberg never got into many actual fights, but totally agree he'd have dropedmost of his opponents
    Fly high Tre Kronor

  • Stephen Bochanski

    I was fortunate enough to be able to watch Forsberg play for two years when he was a Flyer. He was insane, and that's when he was on the tail end of his career. Not only could he spot an open player anywhere on the ice, he could actually get the puck to open player. And don't try to agitate him to knock him off his game…that only made him angry, which would make him play even harder. He was a physical player who had no problem mixing it up, but literally all of the other players on the ice would circle him when he started going at it with someone and he was never "allowed" to get too involved. While you don't want to see your stud fight, I would have loved to have seen it once…he would have destroyed a few guys.

  • Bryan Doherty

    Unreal talent. I admittedly HATED Forsberg in his prime. I was a huge Pavel Bure fan when I was a kid so my western conference team was always Vancouver and the Avs teams of the early 00's were just so tough. Them and the Red Wings had some of the most epic playoff series that I've ever had the luxury of witnessing. But Forsberg, Sakic, Foote, Roy, etc….Ugh, couldn't stand them. Forsberg was always one of my closest boys' favorite player. Kid loved him. And he really was so dominant. But it is a shame his career was cut short. For a comparison's sake for those who aren't hockey fans, think of someone like LeBron James in the NBA with titles on his resume'. Just someone who controlled the whole game and could beat you himself or by making his teammates better. And then imagine LeBron having to retire next year because of injuries. That was Forsberg. Just dominant. Great writeup. Spot on.

Recent Posts

Interested in Writing For TSHQ?

Contact Bryan Doherty with your name, your sports of interest, and a writing sample from prior work. Highly interested in any Golf or Auto Racing bloggers as well as adding a MLB, College Basketball, and Soccer writer.